Vice Dean for the Study of Daniel Happy students to deal with the complaint process security when p

Vice Dean for the Study of Daniel Happy students to deal with the complaint process security when putting up posters. Text comments can be found at the Faculty of National. For sure, it also reprints here.
of 18 First 2013, I received your request to investigate the incident at putting up posters at the Faculty of National Economy (NF). Meanwhile held in connection with this incident repeatedly meeting some of you with Mr. Dean and other faculty members. Although I was not invited detram to one meeting, various interpretations of the circumstances of these meetings and their content have taken this into account in my answers.
In this case, a Joint Declaration Dean NF Miroslav Sevcik, dean Zdenka caught, Chairman of the Academic Senate (AS NF) John Pavlik and head of the department responsible for institutional economics Miroslav Zajicek. detram In that case the resolution adopted later also AS NF. Since the conclusions reached after examining the available materials everywhere I come, disagree with these statements, I am sending this message not only to you but also to them. Analogous to the statement of the dean and his co-workers can also be published on the website of the NF.
The above-mentioned incident was that the student Hana Marie Smrčková and Ludmila echium accompanied by another unidentified person putting up posters in areas NF. To address this situation to the attention of the cleaning staff summoned the guard due to the fact that a day earlier asked the Secretary of NF Mr. Kubin from the department of defense and protection (UOO) to prevent unauthorized posting of material on the premises of NF. Call for proof of identity meet only one of the students, the other refused to do so. After a few minutes of discussion with the present cleaning workers and security detram guards with the students decided to leave the University premises, in which they are security staff tried to prevent closure of the main gate and then physically. With the help of a third person mentioned they all eventually managed to leave the University premises, because she managed to open the gate, despite resistance from security staff. Before the gate was attempted security guard detain a group of students, but was physically escorted away in students. detram As a result of this incident rushed to another security guard baton has resulted in a situation of mutual possession of the person who accompanied the students. The incident ended after one of the students agreed with the submission of identification. (This description corresponds to the incident as guards and concerned students, different interpretations are only pitch and decency act.)
The competent security guard wrote a report about the incident that gave Jaroslav Kubin from the Department of Defense and protection. It was in his words, case closed: he nor representatives of other institutions directly subordinate Rector did not consider the incident to be so important to be further investigated, and demanded an investigation.
These reports and further terms of asset management department, however, on the other hand claimed Dean NF. It also requested footage from security cameras. Subsequently called by officers study student Hana Marie Rom, Ludmila echium, market Vaněčková a student Jana penny that came to him on 22 First 2013. After he arrived, he insisted (despite the demands detram of students), the first will be meeting individually with each person individually, and then only in bulk, or to witness a student representative in the Academic Senate NF. On an individual detram discussions were in addition to the student and the Dean also attended by Vice-Dean Zdeněk Chytil, Chairman of the NF John Pavlik and Miroslav Bunny.
In Case putting up posters, I believe that it is not entirely clear whether the student violated the rules governing promotion in ALL areas. Although this regulation prohibits putting up posters prohibits, but from the context of Regulation (its title and terminology), it is evident that this is referring to illegal advertising. Given that putting up posters to encourage debate on HR policies Dean NF is not easy to determine to what extent should they be applied this rule.
Even if the posting of such posters some internal rule forbidding, it is necessary to bear in mind the fact that up to 18 First 2013 has been posting various posters and information in the areas NF commonplace, and therefore can not help thinking that the application of this provision not in this case, is a selective detram and specific. detram
Finally, in this context, not to mention the fact that 10 years ago, when the "narrow interest group," as if Dean said Ivo Straka, he pleaded prof. Holman, who appealed Straka dean of instruction used by the group (in which today's Dean played a key role) is just such a "poster" form of communication. The fact that the current leaders of the faculty detram prohibit forms of freedom of expression, which themselves have previously used and evidently considered legitimate, I find it ridiculous and sad.
ii) In the case required the guard to legitimize student I find this procedure in accordance with the Rector protection detram and security of property ALL